A case involving genetically modified (GM) food will be in front of a federal judge Friday in San Francisco.
Researchers say the future of generations of Americans hangs in the balance, as the judge could order a halt to the planting or harvesting of any GM "Roundup Ready" sugar beets in the U.S.
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (5)
Monsanto made Agent Orange--how could we not trust them with GMO sugar beets and alfalfa?
Does not most if not all of the responsibility for the use, or misuse, of Agent Orange lie with the US government? After all, the military ordered its production and then used it indiscriminately.
As to the use of round-up ready crops, it is becoming clear that these crops are not the future of agriculture. The secondary effects are too great and lead to far too many other issues with the “target” species. (The target species being those that are being sprayed with round-up in an effort to kill them.)
I guess my problem with Monsanto in regards to Agent Orange is that they should at least be wary of unintended consequences, which they don't seem to be, at least at this point.
In regards to the future crops, Monsanto is on the cutting edge of making every kind of seed round-up resistant. Alfalfa is next. Organic farming is the future, especially for small farmers that can't afford to buy pesticides and Monsanto seeds every year. You wouldn't get this conclusion by studying Monsanto's business practices.
If one talks with Agronomists, one learns quickly that research in the academic sector, where these things “get their start”, is rapidly moving towards organic with GM crops for production, drought resistance, and shorter production time. There is currently work being done on Peaches to shorten the cold hours requirements. There is also work being done on broadening the genetic “background” of field crops to increase pest resistance.
The reasons for the paradigm shifts are obvious, but pest resistance and drought resistance are paramount. The industry is always slow to react to these but the move eventually. Look at what happened to corn production and the disease problems in the seventies from the use of one or two varieties of corn. It took nearly a decade for the changes to take hold in the industry but it happened none the less.
I am not defending ANY corporation! I am defending the work of reputable scientists trying to help humanity. Nothing more nothing less, notice the Academic v. Corporate research.
Another factor that has yet to seriously impact factory farming is the cost of transporting the product. When fuel costs outweigh profits, and they will, the shift back to local, small farmers will explode.
At the same time, it is unfair to bastardize corporations for trying to make a profit. My take on it all is that there needs to be a balance, until the balance is there the situation is going to remain the same. Monsanto’s market share is big but, by no means do they have the entirety of the Ag. Market. Agriculture is too unstable and varies too much to have a company like Monsanto continue for too much longer. Look at some of the companies that were once giants in the industry that are now just barely able to survive. (Sorry, I cannot recall any specifics at the moment.) A related industry that has seen similar things is Horticulture. The companies that dominated the industry ten years ago started crumbling five or six years ago and they have a long way to go! Georgia Pacific, Dow Agro, White Nurseries, Shemin, and there are others that directed the markets. White Nurseries is gone, Shemin is all but history and Monrovia is only stable because of their diversity and name. The only company that did not suffer was Paul Eckies, they did well because they hold nearly all the patents on Poinsettias.
Sorry for the length but, I have been in the industry for over twenty years and can cite many changes in horticulture and agriculture over the years.
I appreciate your aspect on the situation from inside the industry. I don't mind profits for corporations, but pharma has a certain amount of time to profit from their new drugs, then the drugs go generic. Monsanto's plants never go generic; they don't reproduce, either, so it has a virtual monopoly on food production.
The feeling I get from the organic articles I read is that GMOs are taking over and that organic farming is under attack. If organic farming with a GM tweak is the trend, that is better than nothing, but as with Agent Orange, if we allow GM seeds to take over, what happens if/when we realize that the genetic mutations are harming us?
I can only hope that, over time, gas prices will shift the balance back to smaller, local farmers. Our modern food infrastructure is unsustainable (grow ingredients thousands of miles far away from each other, gather them together, process them, and ship them thousands of miles away again). I am currently reading Omnivore's Dilemma and the example of the corn farmer in Iowa who is barely making it is a prime example. He has to buy Monsanto seed, fertilizer, pesticide, etc., and can't even get a complete meal together from his farm because all he has is corn. He doesn't have vegetables, chickens, etc. Without gas neither would he have seeds, nor would he have a market and he would starve along with everyone else.
I appreciate your input and please mistake my ignorance for certainty. I just thought this was a noteworthy piece of news.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



